Difference between revisions of "Garmin etrex Vista Cx I"

From SurveyWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "frameI've used several units in the eTrex series and I would recommend the eTrex Vista HCx It has an altimeter and an electronic compass,...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Garmin gps-etrex-vista-cx 1.jpg|frame]]I've used several units in the eTrex series and I would recommend the eTrex Vista HCx It has an altimeter and an electronic compass, which in my opinion, is just a waste of batteries, but you can turn the compass off so it doesn't do that.
+
After my experience with the Etrex Vista Cx I have decided never to purchase a Garmin product again.  
  
The Vista is smaller than the [[Garmin GPSmap 60CSx]], with a smaller screen, but a good unit and $100 cheaper. However, it is less accurate than the 60CSx which handles interference such as tree cover better and there's no delay between when you press the Mark button and when it captures the waypoint. With the Vista you have to hold the joystick in for a second before it knows you want to capture a waypoint. If you're standing still or walking, this isn't a big deal, but if you're passing through in a vehicle, it's annoying.
+
Customer service was terrible when I tried to get the unit fixed after it partially melted in North Africa. Garmin's world base map on that unit is very limited and there are no additional maps available for the areas in which I work. Garmin used a proprietary file type for their base maps so that customers would not be able to add their own maps or modify the default base map. These same problems apply to the [[Garmin Geko 201|Garmin Geko]], [[Garmin GPSmap 60CSx|GPSmap 60]], and the [[Garmin eTrex Vista HCx|Vista hcx]].
  
I also have the impression that the 60CSx has even better battery life than the Vista, which means you have to carry fewer batteries with you. (Perhaps rechargeable batteries are better these days, but I found 6-9 years ago that they didn't last very long and then were difficult to recharge with a solar recharger. So, it was a lot less hassle and less weight to carry, in the end, to use Duracell or Energizer alkalines. And someone might be able to listen to the radio for a few minutes with them after they won't run your GPS anymore.)
+
I understand now that Garmin has allowed its customers a bit more freedom in uploading raster images to their new units like the Oregon, but from the little I've seen of it, the Oregon still does not compete with the [[Delorme PN-60]].
  
On the Garmin website, the GPSmap 62s also looks interesting, but I have no experience with it. The wireless data sharing might come in handy. I wouldn't recommend the "t" models with the preloaded topographic maps unless you can get them to preload topo maps of your part of the world. I expect that the default set is for the U.S.
 
 
I suspect any unit with a touchscreen is going to use up battery power quickly, so I'd stay away from those.
 
  
 
[[Category:Equipment]]
 
[[Category:Equipment]]

Latest revision as of 16:25, 20 July 2011

After my experience with the Etrex Vista Cx I have decided never to purchase a Garmin product again.

Customer service was terrible when I tried to get the unit fixed after it partially melted in North Africa. Garmin's world base map on that unit is very limited and there are no additional maps available for the areas in which I work. Garmin used a proprietary file type for their base maps so that customers would not be able to add their own maps or modify the default base map. These same problems apply to the Garmin Geko, GPSmap 60, and the Vista hcx.

I understand now that Garmin has allowed its customers a bit more freedom in uploading raster images to their new units like the Oregon, but from the little I've seen of it, the Oregon still does not compete with the Delorme PN-60.