Zoom H4n

From SurveyWiki
Revision as of 15:38, 5 October 2011 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Contributed by Nathan Statezni ==General Overview== The H4n has been recommended for survey over the Marantz PMD 661 on the basis of price and bang-for-buck. Although the ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
 Contributed by Nathan Statezni

General Overview

The H4n has been recommended for survey over the Marantz PMD 661 on the basis of price and bang-for-buck. Although the H4n has very good sound quality and is certainly better than the Zoom H2, it is not the best.

Note that although online reviews will often talk a lot about onboard features and connections, they often do not describe the pre-amp well, if at all. This is the part of the recorder that boosts the microphone signal to something usable. Most cheap recorders have poor, cheap pre-amps. Either you can't boost the microphone up well, or if you do, there's tons of background noise and the subject sounds like they're sitting in a well. The pre-amps on the H4n are in a class above the H2, just as the pre-amps on the 661 are in a class above the H4n. Often that's where the extra money goes.

See also Nathan's Zoom H4n RTT Guide

Back to Equipment Reviews