Difference between revisions of "Sentence Repetition Testing"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{data_collection_tools | {{data_collection_tools | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{SRT_Steps}} | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
A Sentence Repetition Test (SRT) is a tool which langauge surveyors can use to assess community bilingualism. The tool consists of a series of increasingly more complex sentences. The language of the sentences is not the first language of the participant. As the participant hears each sentence, they are asked to repeat it. The surveyor notes the number of errors made in this repetition. The ability of the participant to repeat the sentences and the number of sentences they can repeat without error indicates how bilingual they are in the language of the sentences. | A Sentence Repetition Test (SRT) is a tool which langauge surveyors can use to assess community bilingualism. The tool consists of a series of increasingly more complex sentences. The language of the sentences is not the first language of the participant. As the participant hears each sentence, they are asked to repeat it. The surveyor notes the number of errors made in this repetition. The ability of the participant to repeat the sentences and the number of sentences they can repeat without error indicates how bilingual they are in the language of the sentences. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
Prior to this, second language proficiency testing in language assessment was largely based on tests which were not ideally suited to the survey context. As is still the case in formal second language learning environments, tests are often highly complex and run by highly trained personnel in carefully controlled environments. Attempts to use this in assessment fieldwork revealed a number of methodological problems, largely centring around how difficult it was to administer such a demanding test consistently. Consequently, accurately generalising results to the wider community was problematic. | Prior to this, second language proficiency testing in language assessment was largely based on tests which were not ideally suited to the survey context. As is still the case in formal second language learning environments, tests are often highly complex and run by highly trained personnel in carefully controlled environments. Attempts to use this in assessment fieldwork revealed a number of methodological problems, largely centring around how difficult it was to administer such a demanding test consistently. Consequently, accurately generalising results to the wider community was problematic. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 22:24, 11 April 2011
| Data Collection Tools | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interviews | |
| Observation | |
| Questionnaires | |
| Recorded Text Testing | |
| Sentence Repetition Testing | |
| Word Lists | |
| Participatory Methods | |
| Matched-Guise |
| Sentence Repetition Tests | |
|---|---|
| Developing an SRT | |
| Administering an SRT | |
| Analysing SRT Data |
Introduction
A Sentence Repetition Test (SRT) is a tool which langauge surveyors can use to assess community bilingualism. The tool consists of a series of increasingly more complex sentences. The language of the sentences is not the first language of the participant. As the participant hears each sentence, they are asked to repeat it. The surveyor notes the number of errors made in this repetition. The ability of the participant to repeat the sentences and the number of sentences they can repeat without error indicates how bilingual they are in the language of the sentences.
The test is based on the fact that, for known languages, our brain stores and processes languages in sequences or so-called chunks. A fluent language user has these chunks stored in long-term memory and will be able to reproduce and process them far faster than someone who is a learner. Someone who does not know the language at all may be able to repeat a certain amount, but the short-term memory load will soon be overwhelmed by longer and more complex chunks of language.
As with all assessment tools, findings based on SRTs should be triangulated with other findings from other tools. Data from SRTs are unlikely to be dependent enough for conclusive findings to be based on them alone.
Much of the information below is based on Carla Radloff's excellent overview of SRTs <ref>Radloff, Carla F. (1991). Sentence Repetition Testing for Studies of Community Bilingualism. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.</ref>
A Bit of History
In the 1980s, a vast sociolinguistic survey of northern Pakistan was carried out with Lok Virsa, the National Institute of Folk Heritage in Islamabad. While working on this survey, SRTs were developed in order to improve methodology and get a better grasp of how bilingual a community was.
Prior to this, second language proficiency testing in language assessment was largely based on tests which were not ideally suited to the survey context. As is still the case in formal second language learning environments, tests are often highly complex and run by highly trained personnel in carefully controlled environments. Attempts to use this in assessment fieldwork revealed a number of methodological problems, largely centring around how difficult it was to administer such a demanding test consistently. Consequently, accurately generalising results to the wider community was problematic.
<references />
