Difference between revisions of "Extensibility of Literature"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
However, there are a number of things we need to consider in addition to this. For a start, groups need not only to be similar linguistically but also culturally to the extent that neither group would be socially opposed to such an adaptation. In addition, we need to consider the logistical and technical aspects of adaptation. Is material being produced in enough quantity and quality to be suitable as a source? Are there issues in moving between the source language area and the target area such as periodic flooding, adequate transport or even political issues such as borders? | However, there are a number of things we need to consider in addition to this. For a start, groups need not only to be similar linguistically but also culturally to the extent that neither group would be socially opposed to such an adaptation. In addition, we need to consider the logistical and technical aspects of adaptation. Is material being produced in enough quantity and quality to be suitable as a source? Are there issues in moving between the source language area and the target area such as periodic flooding, adequate transport or even political issues such as borders? | ||
| − | Obviously, producing an adaptation is not something that surveyors are asked to do. Instead, our role is to assess the potential extensibility of literature from one community to another. | + | Obviously, producing an adaptation is not something that surveyors are asked to do. Instead, our role is to assess the potential extensibility of literature from one community to another. |
==Procedure== | ==Procedure== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:extensibility]] | ||
| + | [[Category:literacy]] | ||
Revision as of 21:33, 11 April 2011
Rationale
If two people groups are similar enough, material produced for one group may be adapted relatively easily for use with the other. The language with the existing material is the source language while the language that has yet to receive material is the target language.
In his 1995 book, Grimes suggests we ask
Are any of the speech varieties I'll be surveying so different [from each other] that current adaptation techniques cannot handle them?(p32.)<ref>Grimes, Joseph E.. 1995. Language survey reference guide. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.</ref>
However, there are a number of things we need to consider in addition to this. For a start, groups need not only to be similar linguistically but also culturally to the extent that neither group would be socially opposed to such an adaptation. In addition, we need to consider the logistical and technical aspects of adaptation. Is material being produced in enough quantity and quality to be suitable as a source? Are there issues in moving between the source language area and the target area such as periodic flooding, adequate transport or even political issues such as borders?
Obviously, producing an adaptation is not something that surveyors are asked to do. Instead, our role is to assess the potential extensibility of literature from one community to another.
Procedure
Often materials which have already been produced such as primers or stories are brought along on the survey. The survey team either reads these out, if possible or plays a recording of the texts. This recording should be that of a native speaker of the language the materials are produced in. An even more ideal situation would be to take along some members of the source community.
<references />
